FieldCon vs 15Five: Which Fits a Field or Trades Team?
15Five is an engagement and performance platform built around frequent written check-ins, and it works well for office teams that are comfortable typing updates every week. FieldCon is built for field service and trades crews, where that writing habit never sticks. Instead of weekly typing, FieldCon managers talk through reviews and employees self-assess on their phone, so the work actually gets done.
The short answer
15Five is an engagement and performance platform built around a simple office ritual: every week, employees write a short check-in and managers read and respond. For knowledge teams that live in software, it is a good way to keep feedback flowing.
FieldCon is built for the field, where that ritual falls apart. Foremen and crew leads are not going to sit down and write every week, and neither are the people on their crews. FieldCon trades weekly typing for voice-first reviews and phone-based self-assessments, so the feedback gets captured without asking anyone to become a writer.
FieldCon vs 15Five at a glance
| FieldCon | 15Five | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Field service, trades, deskless crews | Office and hybrid knowledge teams |
| Core habit | Voice-first reviews on your schedule | Weekly written check-ins |
| Manager completes a review by | Talking (transcribed and cleaned up) | Typing |
| Employee participation | Phone link, no app, no login | Account and login |
| Review questions | Role templates from a workforce methodology | Configurable questions and review cycles |
| Between-review pulse | Pulse surveys by text and email | Weekly check-ins and engagement surveys |
| Languages | English and Spanish today, more coming | English-first |
| Pricing | Flat monthly rate, no per-employee fees | Per seat |
| Best for | Crews who will not type | Teams that write updates weekly |
When 15Five is the better choice
15Five is a good fit when your team is office-based and your culture already runs on written communication. If people are comfortable logging in weekly to type a check-in, that steady cadence builds a useful feedback habit and a lot of engagement data over time.
When FieldCon is the better choice
FieldCon is built for the team 15Five was not designed for: crews in the field. The difference shows up in who actually participates.
- Managers talk instead of type. A foreman records answers out loud and FieldCon writes them up.
- Employees use their phone, not an account. A text or email link, done in minutes, no app to install.
- Questions are role-specific from day one, built from a methodology proven across hundreds of trades companies.
- You still hear about problems early through pulse surveys, without a weekly login requirement.
The bottom line
If your team writes weekly and lives in software, 15Five's check-in model is a strength. If your people are on job sites, the weekly-writing habit will not hold, and FieldCon's voice-first, phone-based approach is the one that fits how field crews actually work.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between FieldCon and 15Five?
15Five is built around a weekly written check-in ritual for office teams. FieldCon is built for the field: managers complete reviews by talking, not typing, and employees self-assess on their phone with no app or login. FieldCon fits crews who will never sit down and write a weekly update.
Does FieldCon do engagement surveys like 15Five?
Yes. FieldCon includes pulse surveys, short anonymous check-ins sent by text and email between reviews, so you keep a read on morale without asking field employees to log into a platform every week.
Is 15Five better for continuous feedback?
15Five is designed around continuous, written feedback, which suits office teams. For field crews, that cadence rarely holds. FieldCon focuses on getting real, role-specific reviews done plus periodic pulse checks, which is the rhythm that actually works for deskless teams.